Feedburner
About 2 weeks ago I started using feedburner for my main feed. It took a while to decide because I prefer being independent as far as possible but feedburner offers some interesting services like stats (currently 1! subscriber [me]) I wanted to try.
The actual feed page looks like this by default. This is the feed for the b-sides category, just as an example. For my main feed I chose a different style.
The default style looks much nicer but I decided against it, because it looks to much like a regular web page.
Today a friend emailed asking where he could find the link to the feed, pointing me to the feedburner address.
Well, this is the feed, it just doesn’t look like it. I think a lot of people who are not geeks just got used to the pattern “if I read XML and there is a lot of crazy code on the page, this is a feed”.
So if the audience of a blog consists of rather regular internet users, using a styled feed can really be a disadvantage.
Even if they are right on it, they might not identify it as a feed and might eventually not subscribe.


One Response to “Feedburner”
When I first saw feedburner pages, I didn’t subscribe because I was confused. Just like you stated, I was expecting XML, not a page. And I am a geek myself!
So when I recommended feedburner for my company’s blog, we gave out a URL that forwards to feedburner, but didn’t actually link it. We’re hoping that people will just copy and paste that link into their aggregator. (Here’s a link to our subscription solution for all different kinds of users: http://internetstrategy.us/blog/index.php/site/subscribe/ )
Notice: Undefined variable: oddcomment in /home/htdocs/users/mgreller/mgreller/lynk.de/wp-content/themes/rage - white/comments.php on line 43